I am a bit confused as to which is the best code to use for a splinter removal from the plantar aspect of the foot. The patient presented with a superficial splinter which was removed in a few seconds w/o anesthesia, etc. And all I needed to do was apply some topical abs and a band aid. Their insurance fee schedule pays more for a mid level visit (99213) than CPT 10120 (simple removal of superficial splinter). Can I legitimately bill for the E/M as it pays more?
top of page
© 2024 The Doctor Line sponsored by Foot in Motion
Advertisement
Advertisement
bottom of page
I agree with Dr. Kesselman, you removed superficial foreign body the correct procedure is CPT 10120, it is important to bill what you do. If there was an E/M that was distinct and separate then that is 99213-25. Billing is based on what you do and not the reimbursement!
If you base your billing only on the fee schedule, without regards to what you actually performed, than , I fear that you may be making a huge mistake. You should be billing for what you did and not for what pays more or to circumvent the medical policies. In this case you performed a simple splinter removal, its location does not matter. This scenario applies to any physician removing a splinter from any location. If the removal was simple, no local, no sutures, no sophisticated bandaging, etc. then CPT 10120 is appropriate.
As for looking at the fee schedule, I am not sure how you came up with the idea that an E/M for an established patient paid more than for a simple splinter removal. The fee schedule for Queens NY for Fee for Service Medicare is as follows:
10120: $178.64; 99212: $65.13 99213 $103.68
If it were a new patient the E/M are: 99202: $83.01 99203: $127.76
If it were in fact a new patient, it may also be possible to submit a claim for the E/M depending on what is documented in the chart regarding the Medical Decision Making complexity. This would depend on a lot of other factors. I am sure others more skilled in billing E/M may choose to chime in on this, but regardless, I don't see that the E/M pays more than a simple splinter removal. Thus, I am unsure where that idea came from.